Best Powder Protein For Football Players

Very weak the claims made by Giulia Bongiorno during the women's event yesterday. "I'm not here to partying hard to criticize, but to do so when they become the system of selection of its leaders, "he said.

Ms. Bongiorno already knows that these feasts have existed. Too bad the judiciary - which has the last word - but should still find out. Prudence should guide the talented lawyer at a time when the Italians was a mafioso Andreotti made the worst, she skillfully managed to blur the image.

Explain what then centered the ladies Gelmini, Brambilla, Carfagna, Bernini, etc. Ravetto. With the hard partying. They are part of the ruling class, but not because they have participated in these feasts hypothetical. You do not see ladies in the center, placed in high positions of responsibility - these can be described as "leadership" - which are in that position for the reason given by Bongiorno. Whilst it may be that these feasts took place, they may have made the most of the food for the undergrowth of power, not for its ruling class.

If we are not partying hard to select the ruling class, but physical beauty - so Bongiorno should give a more balanced way in his complaint - about the Berlusconi expressed by saying that for the same skills, he presferisce a good looking woman. As in football, level on points, goal difference wins. It seems to me that there is nothing to object.

Home Made Coin Pucher

PURITANI

Giuliano Ferrara has a right and a wrong in his speech to the TG 1 (published on the website of the Republic):

1. The reason is that it is true that a very large number of opponents of Berlusconi tries to remove it by leveraging on moralistic aspects of his private behavior.

I have two examples: in the wake of statements by the prosecutor Brutti Liberati - who said there were no irregularities in the night that Ruby was entrusted to the adviser Minetti - Rosy Bindi, transmission Ballarò, placed emphasis on the private behavior of the premier, indicated as a bad example to follow and a bad model education. This statement, entirely legitimate, however improper in a broadcast that has political , while it is correct if it is expressed in other contexts .

Another example: the reference to the Constitution indicates where the integrity of the prime minister and state offices is also applicable here only a political or judicial. E 'inappropriate - and is purely moral evidence - applied to the sphere of private behavior, where these behaviors have no other significance.

of this "moralistic" is fully aware of the center such as the philosopher Cacciari, who never misses an opportunity inviting it to submit instead a solid policy proposal alternative.

2.Il Consite wrong in charging the court of morality.

In the face of evidence of crime (in this case, child prostitution and extortion), it has the mandatory prosecution, and therefore legitimately be put in place due to the actions - such as wiretapping, to the trial - in order to arrive at defining the subsistence or less of the same offense. There is therefore no intrinsic behavior that is judged, but only those acts which, in that behavior, have an offense.

Cover Pipes Under Pedestal Sink

MASI AND SANTORO arrogant person such failure

cast write after seeing and hearing the comparison between the Director General of RAI and Masi Santoro during the last episode of Year Zero. Before Masi says Santoro in previous broadcasts had "insulted live, as listeners know," to which Santoro rightly reply " as you say, not know how the audience", as it is a procedure in place court must give its opinion. Arrogance of Masi. Then these states to opt out after the type of transmission set by Santoro, "because the view of my lawyers and my purple clearly the code of practice on the representation of legal proceedings in broadcasting and the constitutional and legislative principles that underlie it. "Based on these allegations, Santoro replied that" you are saying that this transmission violates the rules "and therefore should be consistently close the program, or withdraw the above deadline. Arrogance of Santoro. Why Masi has clearly expressed his opinion (and its legal) and not a certainty, based on which of course he can not close transmission, and can not - nor is it fair that takes place - ritirarare what is his free opinion. Here are two people from Ego of them have given a very bad example of mutual tolerance.