Home Made Coin Pucher

PURITANI

Giuliano Ferrara has a right and a wrong in his speech to the TG 1 (published on the website of the Republic):

1. The reason is that it is true that a very large number of opponents of Berlusconi tries to remove it by leveraging on moralistic aspects of his private behavior.

I have two examples: in the wake of statements by the prosecutor Brutti Liberati - who said there were no irregularities in the night that Ruby was entrusted to the adviser Minetti - Rosy Bindi, transmission Ballarò, placed emphasis on the private behavior of the premier, indicated as a bad example to follow and a bad model education. This statement, entirely legitimate, however improper in a broadcast that has political , while it is correct if it is expressed in other contexts .

Another example: the reference to the Constitution indicates where the integrity of the prime minister and state offices is also applicable here only a political or judicial. E 'inappropriate - and is purely moral evidence - applied to the sphere of private behavior, where these behaviors have no other significance.

of this "moralistic" is fully aware of the center such as the philosopher Cacciari, who never misses an opportunity inviting it to submit instead a solid policy proposal alternative.

2.Il Consite wrong in charging the court of morality.

In the face of evidence of crime (in this case, child prostitution and extortion), it has the mandatory prosecution, and therefore legitimately be put in place due to the actions - such as wiretapping, to the trial - in order to arrive at defining the subsistence or less of the same offense. There is therefore no intrinsic behavior that is judged, but only those acts which, in that behavior, have an offense.