Parmenides of Elea |
philosophers Parmenides opposed before the all and nothing,
but can not exclude that there is NOTHING I can do something broke in the whole and the change KNOWLEDGE that has been gained so far.
The quinidi all and nothing really I am not absolutely opposed, since one can not exclude that there may be no "something".
With Parmenides leads to this conflict absolute being (the whole) is opposed to ABSOLUTELY NOT (The Nothing).
The whole can not be anything (there is nothing in all that may come to nothing),
nothingness can not be all (there is nothing in anything that can get into everything ).
Experience shows, however, the transition from all to nothing, and vice versa, contradicting the preceding two paragraphs.
ILLUSION It should therefore be considered.
0 comments:
Post a Comment