Herpes Whitlow On Hands

HK, Nathan Road

I can hardly imagine the control and censorship in China. I've been to China twice and three more in Hong Kong, in all cases as a simple tourist. I have quietly visited Shanghai, Ningbo and Guangzhou. I had the impression that countries frantic rush toward modernization (= globalization). Fewer and fewer bicycles and more and more 'cars. A proliferation of malls and fast-food western (first of all McDonald's). In any case, nothing to do with Hong Kong (in full Western and post-western). I became aware of the criticism only when I tried to update my blog ... I did not succeed. Facebook and various blog platforms are locked to prevent the passage of info. However, Google as a search engine works and I have tried things like "Fuck communism", "pig mao", "Free Tibet" ... In Shanghai prostitutes are offered continuously in the center: they are pretty girls, dressed normally, not giving the eye ... but that appeal for grace, 'cause they speak English and because' attack button ... Chinese girls are usually rather more 'timid and do not begin the conversation on their own initiative. Cell phones abound. The info also travel via SMS and a Chinese man who knows the English are various possibilities of information through the Net Now 'cause this obstinacy of a control impossible? It 'just yesterday's news of a demonstration in Beijing in the style of those who are inflamed Libya and Algeria. Immediately have taken hundreds police officers who arrested the protesters and made blocking action to mobile phones and information. Few newspapers are reporting about these events Chinese (I've read on an Arctic Repubblica.it).
For a tourist to get into western China need a visa (which in Italy you get in a few days at a cost of demanding more than 60 €), once inside you can 'turn freely, you forget you are in a free country, where the population does not vote and where this population and 'serious and credible information is denied. It is impressive, but maybe not. 1.3 billion people are a huge number and dangerous. How to hold off so many 'great? How to manage it without blowing the dissatisfied? How reassuring outside observers that will not serve 'maybe a future war to shift public attention from the huge internal contradictions (and by so much injustice)? Obviously the tourist is not interested in these things and you are on Chinese soil qaundo and 'easy to get from folkrore, colors, sounds, beautiful faces from the East, from the curiosity that stirs in those encounters, low prices and the infinite' availability of goods.

HERE a good article on "The Republic" speech on the complaint of the Web (in general, not just China)

Best Powder Protein For Football Players

Very weak the claims made by Giulia Bongiorno during the women's event yesterday. "I'm not here to partying hard to criticize, but to do so when they become the system of selection of its leaders, "he said.

Ms. Bongiorno already knows that these feasts have existed. Too bad the judiciary - which has the last word - but should still find out. Prudence should guide the talented lawyer at a time when the Italians was a mafioso Andreotti made the worst, she skillfully managed to blur the image.

Explain what then centered the ladies Gelmini, Brambilla, Carfagna, Bernini, etc. Ravetto. With the hard partying. They are part of the ruling class, but not because they have participated in these feasts hypothetical. You do not see ladies in the center, placed in high positions of responsibility - these can be described as "leadership" - which are in that position for the reason given by Bongiorno. Whilst it may be that these feasts took place, they may have made the most of the food for the undergrowth of power, not for its ruling class.

If we are not partying hard to select the ruling class, but physical beauty - so Bongiorno should give a more balanced way in his complaint - about the Berlusconi expressed by saying that for the same skills, he presferisce a good looking woman. As in football, level on points, goal difference wins. It seems to me that there is nothing to object.

Home Made Coin Pucher

PURITANI

Giuliano Ferrara has a right and a wrong in his speech to the TG 1 (published on the website of the Republic):

1. The reason is that it is true that a very large number of opponents of Berlusconi tries to remove it by leveraging on moralistic aspects of his private behavior.

I have two examples: in the wake of statements by the prosecutor Brutti Liberati - who said there were no irregularities in the night that Ruby was entrusted to the adviser Minetti - Rosy Bindi, transmission Ballarò, placed emphasis on the private behavior of the premier, indicated as a bad example to follow and a bad model education. This statement, entirely legitimate, however improper in a broadcast that has political , while it is correct if it is expressed in other contexts .

Another example: the reference to the Constitution indicates where the integrity of the prime minister and state offices is also applicable here only a political or judicial. E 'inappropriate - and is purely moral evidence - applied to the sphere of private behavior, where these behaviors have no other significance.

of this "moralistic" is fully aware of the center such as the philosopher Cacciari, who never misses an opportunity inviting it to submit instead a solid policy proposal alternative.

2.Il Consite wrong in charging the court of morality.

In the face of evidence of crime (in this case, child prostitution and extortion), it has the mandatory prosecution, and therefore legitimately be put in place due to the actions - such as wiretapping, to the trial - in order to arrive at defining the subsistence or less of the same offense. There is therefore no intrinsic behavior that is judged, but only those acts which, in that behavior, have an offense.