Prom Dresses For Rent Manila

We can talk about "common good" only if we understand it as an "extension of universal rights." As is known, the conquest of rights is a gradual, incomplete and always avoidable. In fact, historically, the ruling classes (who base their rule on the property) have always held more free space. This is evidence of the facts. "Common Good" means nothing but a loss by the ruling class of space domain and acquisition of an 'other class of the right to equal space. "Common Good" means so the conflict between a class that holds the rights to maintain, and another class that has fewer rights and who want to take. That's why the "common good"
- not a common ground, but it is a battleground;
- not a lowest common denominator that unites, but an object to be moved from side to side;
- is not the reasonableness of an agreement, but it's vital clash.
speak of "common good" is historically a non-sense, because the logic of exploitation (based on the concept of ownership), there is only pursuit, by the oppressed classes, of their dignity, to struggle against the lower classes dominant classes with all their forces would keep the domain.